The necessity to re-group against Fascism once again!
International
collaboration against the Mullah’s Regime
Kayvan
Kaboli
The
topic of my discussion tonight is going to be the necessity for the
formation of a new Anti-Fascist coalition.
To
begin with, let’s examine the reality or the myth about the resurrection
of Fascism once again in the 21st century.
Would
it be a mere exaggeration to recognize the Tehran Regime of Fascist essence?
The ferocity of Islamic fundamentalism
in general and the Iranian Regime’s in particular as a threatening phenomenon,
is not bound exclusively to the Iranian people or the Middle East alone. The Mullahs’ reactionary Regime has evolved
into an aggressive Clero-Fascist establishment and is on the verge of
stepping out of its own national territory. They have already become
an international threat. This Regime has already started its covert
aggression by organising its allies and terrorist groups around the
world. In the Middle East, Hamas,
Hezbollah, and The Army of Mahdi
are only but a few examples to mention.
To put this into context, the
Iranian State
run Mehr News Agency reported an event in
January 2006 which reads: “Ahmadinejad told a crowd of theological students
in the holy city of Qom
that, We must believe in the fact that Islam
is not confined to geographical borders, ethnic groups and nations.
It’s a universal ideology that leads the world to justice. We don’t
shy away from declaring that Islam is ready to rule the world”
The brutality of this regime
against its own people such as mass executions and the torture of the
dissidents and the “Infidels” by the thousands in prisons which are
repeatedly reported by the Amnesty International and the Human Rights’
Watch organisations are not my proving points of the Fascist essence
of this Regime.
The key issue here is their
program of territory expansion.
The Clero-Fascism’s initial
target is Iraq.
After achieving this, Iraq
will be considered as the stepping stone in order to vanquish Israel. And as
I’m sure you are fully aware, Ahmadinejad has not hesitated to declare
this on more than one occasion.
We must therefore, ask the question
whether Ahmadinejad is exaggerating or merely deluding his listeners!
Unfortunately, sufficing to
holding mere discussions or debates about the resurrection of Fascism
as a fact or a myth in this era would not prevent the next human catastrophe
on earth. It would be good, if as discussions were going on, the fundamentalists
held back and waited for the result of our analysis!
To make my point clearer, let
me make use of an environmental analogy. The threat of global warming
is a well known issue which we are all well aware of. Similar to the
concept of resurrecting Fascism, there is a debate going on about the
factual or mythical notion of Global Warming amongst different points
of view.
Here, I don’t want to refer
to the righteousness of humans’ role in causing or contributing to the creation
of Global Warming. Instead, I would like to argue that our approach
and the options we choose to face the problem could have different impact
on humans’ lives throughout the world.
Regarding the Global Warming,
we are faced with two options:
We either do nothing in the
hope that Global Warming is just a myth and the whole discussion is
an exaggeration, or otherwise we take it seriously and act accordingly
to combat the problem.
Like everything else, most people
especially the politicians, always consider the economic impact of their
options when it comes to taking action.
Taking action means producing
lower harmful emission and regulating companies’ wastes and designating
the cost to the production process. This would obviously affect the
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) figures in each country. Of course, the
sceptical view about the concept of Global Warming would try to save
this extra cost in the hope that the whole thing is a myth! Such sceptical
approach would not want to jeopardise the levels of their profit!
However, if Global Warming is
taken as factual, as many evidences prove it to be, ignoring it would
almost certainly cause a major catastrophe that will pose a serious
threat to the humans’ life as well as other forms of life on earth.
Let us now consider
our options with the threat of the Clero-fascist regime of Iran.
Mullahs are pursuing
with the nuclear technology and at the same time striving to islamise
the world which incidentally, would begin by wiping Israel off the world’s map! This should
not be considered as just a tall order as they have already organised
their terrorist groups in the Middle East.
Now, the world in general and the European Union in particular have
two options; Either to continue with their normal economic ties and
relations with the Iranian regime and sign up profitable contracts in
the hope that the whole notion of Clero-Fascism is a myth, or to take
preventive measures in order to halt the ambitious holders of the Fascist
State power in Iran.
In the first option,
Europe would be hopeful that the nuclear
energy attained will only be used for peaceful projects. The worst case
scenario being that even if they do lay their hands on atomic bomb,
they would not intend to use it or in the very worst case, the “quassam”
rocket or other short range rockets would be limited to only reach the
northern Israeli territories.
This of course goes
hand in hand as well as other issues such as the violation of Human
Rights which has been particularly ignored by the western States.
But what if the nuclear threat
is a fact? It would be naive to think that it wouldn’t affect you. Don’t think that you are immune. Look at most major
cities in Europe now. They already
have enough fundamentalists in place for the time of action. Don’t make
a mistake! They don’t need to deploy soldiers, they are already here!
You might say OK; these Muslims
in Europe are not Sheiats. But let me reiterate that
when it comes to terrorism, the Iranian regime makes use of every possibility!
The Iranian regime is backing the Sonnies as well as the Sheiats in
Iraq in order
to achieve its goals.
Having once experienced the
20th century’s Fascism, It would be naive of the 21st
century’s humans to overlook such threat once again. For those of you
who are too sceptical, I’d say man hasn’t experienced the global warming
in his living memory, but fascism and Nazism are not even a century
away. I’m not sure about you ladies and gentlemen sitting in the European
parliament, but the Iranians have experienced Islamic fundamentalists
with their flesh and bones and we are forewarning you about the consequences
of remaining passive on this global issue.
The adopted appeasement policy
by the Europeans shows that they are overlooking the reality of Clero-Fascism.
To assume that Ahmadinejad doesn’t mean it or he couldn’t mean it or
presuming that he just wants to spread his Islamic propaganda to attract
the people of the Middle East to become a populist leader in the region
would be a grave mistake! Wasn’t
Hitler a populist leader himself? What would be YOUR guaranty that Ahmadinejad
won’t follow the same trend? How would the appeasement policy be justified?
The appeasement policy with
the Mullah’s by the EU for the sake of juicy contracts like the OMV
deal can only hinder the efforts of the oppressed people of Iran as
well as the opposition groups to the regime to rid itself from the evil
of the ruling Clero-Fascists in Tehran. This is shameful!
So far in this conference, we
were introduced with different solutions from different point of views.
Let’s look at the issue through the Iranian people eyes. The main problem
that works as an obstacle to hold the Iranian people back from joining
students or labour movements and eventually toppling Mullahs is the
appeasement policy by western countries. The appeasement policy works
in two ways in favour of Mullahs, first through economic trades which
prevent any political pressure on Iranian regime and second, tying hands
of the largest Iranian opposition group in Europe. Let me emphasise
this: overthrowing the fascist regime of Iran is the duty of Iranian people
with the help of international community. And this process has not started
with Ahmadinejad’s presidency.
Let me add this too; one mustn’t
think that should Ahmadinejad’s presidential term be over, the situation
will be resolved. We are dealing with a system and not an individual.
Remember that under Khatami, the so called former moderate president,
pursuing the attainment of the atomic bomb didn’t stop; not even for
a day.
Religious Fascism is by far
more threatening than that of the previous model which based its ideology
upon superior human race. Using the mentality of suicide bombing and
culture of martyrdom based on supernatural ideas and superior religion
makes Clero-fascism more dangerous than of those earthly-classical types
of fascism. Both variants of Fascism however, have common objectives;
to eradicate the Jews, progressive ideas, homosexuality and in general,
freedom as a whole.
Clero-Fascism is preparing to
launch its attack in a systematic manner. Therefore, opposing such threat
requires a systematic approach.
The Iranian regime knows how
to manipulate the EU’s appeasement policy. They have their well organised
lobby groups around the western countries to push their agendas in order
to achieve their goals.
Another aspect of the Clero-fascist
regime is its contradictory façade that could lead to the westerners
to think that the Mullahs are so vulnerable that they can be restrained
as and when necessary. This is not simply true. One must be aware of
the structural differences in organisational methods by which two sides
function. The Fundamentalists may seem to be disorganised. It may appear
as though it would be easy to bring them down by simply working on their
inherent contradictions.
In the last 2 decades, the west
has been trying to manipulate certain factions within the regime in
the hope of achieving a certain degree of reform within Iran’s political theocracy. As we
all know, this policy simply hasn’t worked!
Instead, Ahmadinejad emerged
out of this very system and clearly questioned the Holocaust!
Ladies and Gentlemen, this has
to be taken extremely seriously and not simply taken as Ahmadinejad’s
insanity! Ahmadinejad simply tested the west’s sensitiveness on the
issue of the Holocaust and got his desirable outcome by the west’s apathetic
response.
Neither the Iranian peoples’
opposition struggle nor the International efforts in isolation would
be able to confront Clerical Fascism.
The correct course of action
is the formation of an international Anti-Fascist Front. This is the
only effective means of confronting and exerting pressure on both Fascism
and the appeasement policy apparatus in favour of the Mullahs.
Only such Anti-Fascist Front
is capable of averting a catastrophic war which would inevitably take
place if the Clero-Fascist threat is not taken seriously. By forming
such Front, organized pressure can be exerted over the Iranian Regime.
In this way the Mullahs would not be able to hide behind their phoney
peace movements and blame the infidels for insulting Islam or even position
themselves as vanguards of anti-capitalist movements.
All organizations, governments,
countries, and individuals can join the anti-fascist front in order
to retreat Fascism in a joint and harmonized effort.
Fascism can only be defeated
in its state of retreat!
Overcoming such threat can only
be achieved by an international Anti-Fascist Front.
My final word is: we have to
halt the Islamic fundamentalists before it’s too late. The Iranian regime
as a State power behind the aggressive version of the Islamic fundamentalists
has to be stopped and defeated in order to psychologically tame the
Islamic extremists and put an end to worldwide terrorism. Otherwise,
the worst of what has been seen so far is yet to be anticipated.
